The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below.
The bar chart compares the average prices per km of clothing that were exported from the six countries to the European Union in the year of 1993 and 2003. The data is presented in the unit of Euro Pound.
It is clear that the prices of clothing exported from deprived countries were much lower than that from those affluent counterparts. However, Argentina and Brazil offered the most expensive clothing in both years.
In 1993, price of clothing from Argentina was in the dominant position, standing at staggering 28 pound per km. Likewise, Brazil sold the clothing at about 23 pound per km and that was the second most expensive clothing being imported into the EU. In stark contrast, numbering a mere 3 pound, the price of Bangladesh's clothing was the lowest.
In 2003, the clothing price per kilometer from each country varied greatly. While there was drop in price by 2 pound from Argentina and Japan, China, India and Bangladesh's increased significantly, of which China's clothing price grew by 7 pound and overtook Japan's as the third most expensive clothing importer, reaching 17 pound per km. Lastly, with 23 pound, the average clothing price in Brazil remained constant after a decade.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...ant position, standing at staggering 28 pound per km. Likewise, Brazil sold the cloth...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...e, Brazil sold the clothing at about 23 pound per km and that was the second most exp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
.... In stark contrast, numbering a mere 3 pound, the price of Bangladeshs clothing was ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of Bangladeshs clothing was the lowest. In 2003, the clothing price per kilomete...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...tly. While there was drop in price by 2 pound from Argentina and Japan, China, India ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...f which Chinas clothing price grew by 7 pound and overtook Japans as the third most e...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...xpensive clothing importer, reaching 17 pound per km. Lastly, with 23 pound, the aver...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...aching 17 pound per km. Lastly, with 23 pound, the average clothing price in Brazil r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, likewise, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55781397223 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542288557214 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0246374375 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363136738192 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166814702612 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146589887905 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256408070629 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117565715586 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.