The bar chart below gives information about the amount of tax that various and cultural organizations were required to pay last year

Essay topics:

The bar chart below gives information about the amount of tax that various and cultural organizations were required to pay last year.

The presented bar graph outlines the information on tax

payment and tax exemption of various organizations in the last year.

A glance at the chart reveals that tax paying institutions out number by 9048 more than the institutions that are exempted from paying.

Coming to tax payable art and cultural companies, art performing organizations stood top in payment. With 11,407 institutions which is more than all the other tax paying organizations combined. Interestingly, all the companies in retail art section has to pay tax which stood in second place after art performing organizations. In contrast, companies below 1000 is to pay tax in museum and historical sites etc., Which is least of all.

Then, exemption from tax in historical sites and the ones that exhibit historical artifacts is more with 4,793 institutions. With this number, it occupies the top place in the figures. Secondly, art performing organizations took next place with 914 companies less than museums in tax exemption. Unfortunately, there is no such thing of tax exemption in retail art dealers institution.

Votes
Average: 8 (11 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar graph outlines the information on tax payment and tax exemption of various org...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Payment
...raph outlines the information on tax payment and tax exemption of various organizati...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, then, as to, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37572254335 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13732816682 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554913294798 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.477766793 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234588300709 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101358957323 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942312069204 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167291903422 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890527714042 0.0819641961636 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.