The bar chart below show the medical research funding on some diseases and deaths caused due to them in somelans in 1990.

Essay topics:

The bar chart below show the medical research funding on some diseases and deaths caused due to them in somelans in 1990.

The horizontal chart depicts the information about the medical research funding on some diseases and death caused by someland in particular year 1990. The data is calibrated in million.it is clearly and coherently represented.
Having a quick glance upon the bar chart. The highest amount of data was spent on AIDS that is 180 million dollars, whereas only 30 million dollar amount spent on TB . Moving furthering the someland spend on medical research funding on malaria was 50 million dollar, then medical research funding on leprosy and tropical diseases was 80 million dollar respectively.
It can be seen that death clouded in someland.
In 1990, the 18 million was death in someland due to TB , and AIDS.leprosy or tropical disease after the medical research funding was0.3,0.1 or 0.4 million respectively.afterword malaria diseases people death rate was 1.4 million.
Overall ,it is evident that , death rate in some land are related to medical research funding on the diseases.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ar year 1990. The data is calibrated in million.it is clearly and coherently represente...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nly 30 million dollar amount spent on TB . Moving furthering the someland spend on...
^^
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... million was death in someland due to TB , and AIDS.leprosy or tropical disease af...
^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ple death rate was 1.4 million. Overall ,it is evident that , death rate in some ...
^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
....4 million. Overall ,it is evident that , death rate in some land are related to ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28662420382 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97801842674 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.0034178775 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333452279962 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154631439596 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131394991915 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200361554571 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902571679045 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.