The graphs illustrate the proportion of average water usage in some cities and the purposes for consuming it in Australia last year.
In general, water was highly used in Perth in comparison with other areas. Moreover, agriculture was the field possessing an enormous rate of water consumption distribution.
It can be seen clearly in the first chart that every city in Australia had distinctive amount of consumed water. Perth, as aformentioned, led the top with exact 300 kilolitre per property, followed by Brisbane which was 250 kilolitre. In contract, Canberra tends to be the place whose citizens saving water the most by only around 125 kalolitre being used per household.
Meanwhile, the pie chart shows more than half of its total percentage (67%) of water spent on agricultural activities. On the other hand, the figures were significantly small for the rest criteria, in which noticealy similar numbers between water supply, sewage & drainage and electricity & gas Supply (7 %) as well as between manufacturing and other industries usage aims (4%). In addition, water consumed for mining reached the bottom of the rank with merely 2%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilolitre' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilolitres'.
Suggestion: kilolitres
...ormentioned, led the top with exact 300 kilolitre per property, followed by Brisbane whic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilolitre' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilolitres'.
Suggestion: kilolitres
...rty, followed by Brisbane which was 250 kilolitre. In contract, Canberra tends to be the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
...well as between manufacturing and other industries usage aims 4%. In addition, water consu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, in general, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22950819672 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87614309417 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699453551913 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7147418333 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7777777778 5.23603664747 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238635589816 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943880443999 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693154482481 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144828448076 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067182771943 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.