The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25-44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of men aged 25 to 44 in Sydney who were born in Australia or overseas, according to how much income they earn on a weekly basis.
The majority of Australian-born men (approximately 35%) belong to the middle income group, earning between $600 and $1000 per week. A significant number (about 30%) fall into the lower middle income category, while just 13% of Australian- born men are in the low income group, earning less than $300 per week.
In contrast, the majority (over one third) of overseas-born men belong to the lower middle income group. Just over a quarter fall into the middle income category and a similar proportion (approximately 22%) of overseas-born men in Sydney, are part of the low income group. It is interesting to note that this is almost double the number of Australian- born men from the same group.
Overall, it can be seen that men who were born in Australia aged between 25 and 44 have higher incomes than men in the same age group who were born overseas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...up earning less than 300 per week In contrast the majority over one third of overseas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...born in Australia aged between 25 and 44 have higher incomes than men in the same...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57541899441 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59214265049 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491620111732 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 179.0 22.4926829268 796% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 819.0 112.824112599 726% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 179.0 22.9334400587 781% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 29.0 5.23603664747 554% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315166501532 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.315166501532 0.103423049105 305% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23561252567 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111482394317 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 89.6 13.2329268293 677% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -101.75 61.2550243902 -166% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 71.9 10.3012195122 698% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.47 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.54 8.06136585366 180% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.4329268293 516% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 73.6 10.9970731707 669% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 74.0 11.0658536585 669% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.