The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25-44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the ratio of various income categories of men, who are born in Australia or overseas aged between 25 to 44.
Overall, as shown in a bar chart, Australian-born men earn more money than those who were born overseas. Furthermore, higher income groups are consistently lower in men born overseas as compared to the Australian born men group.
In terms of Australian men who are born in Australia, middle income group, who earn (600-1000) dollars are the highest and it was followed by lower middle income group. The middle age group exceeds lower income by exactly 5%. Similarly, high income group and low income group are the two lowest figures in this group, which are 20% and nearly 15% respectively.
Turning to men born overseas group, the lower middle was the highest income group, which is approximately 3% higher than Australian born men and this figure was followed by the men who earn $600 to $1000 by just over 25%. In this group, lower income men are below than one-fourth and the least figure was exactly 15%, which was hold by high income men, who earn more than $1000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... group exceeds lower income by exactly 5 Similarly high income group and low inco...
^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which are 20 and nearly 15 respectively Turning to men born overseas group the l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, similarly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63541666667 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4122625099 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416666666667 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 192.0 22.4926829268 854% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 890.0 112.824112599 789% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 192.0 22.9334400587 837% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 22.0 5.23603664747 420% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278999574587 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.278999574587 0.103423049105 270% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226919391117 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601727004731 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 96.4 13.2329268293 728% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -106.48 61.2550243902 -174% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 75.8 10.3012195122 736% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.82 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.3 8.06136585366 190% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 78.8 10.9970731707 717% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 79.0 11.0658536585 714% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.