The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 20002 to 2007
The bar chart illustrates the adolescents of Chester spending hours doing various activities per week between 2002 and 2007.
Overall, watching television was the favorite activities for Chester’s youth throughout the timeline, while bowling was the less demanded activities. The bar chart depicts the increasing trend for going to pubs, watching television and shopping, however rest activities follow declining trend with some erratic pattern.
To begin with, youth people of Chester’s favorite thing is watching television, which increase from 25 hours per week to more than 35 hours per week, in between 2002 and 2007. Similarly, second demanded activities of youth was going to pubs with nearly 18 hours per week in 2007, which is more than 20 hours per week from starting year. Furthermore, shopping start with approximately 7 hours per week and end with 15 hours per week as highest spending hours.
In term of homework and sports, it decreases dramatically just over 5 and below 5 hours per week from around 18 hours and exactly 10 hours per week respectively. Watching DVDs accounted just above 10 hours per week in 2002, with some erratic pattern, experienced its highest at 2004 and declined up to exactly 10 hours per week in 2007. However, bowling was the least doing activities, which remained below 5 hours per week throughout the six years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, second, similarly, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18918918919 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69212645359 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509009009009 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.2113212054 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430474365025 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222686015507 0.103423049105 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114670185776 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301886953962 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135491237675 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.