The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The number of male adults registered in four different evening courses at a learning centre and the rate of participants' ages in these courses in 2009 are displayed in the bar and pie chart.
Overall, women students were more likely to study the whole subjects, except learning sculpture. Furthermore, the education centre was dominated by the elderly attendees, while other age groups varied.
As per data, the most popular class was language study among females, showing the number at 40 learners, while males enrolling this course only accounted for a half of the former. Meanwhile, the favorite subject of men was painting at around 25 people, but it was still lower than the counterpart, with a gap of 5 persons. Regarding the drama class, females were more interested in this at 20 students than males, with the number at only a half of the counterpart sex, and the sculpture one was marked to be the least-known in both genders at below one in two of the maximum data recorded.
Turning to ages, the vast majority of learners were the eldery, being slightly more than two fifths, followed by the second oldest at approximately a quarter, and 16% of tricenarian. When it comes the two remaining age categories, the proportion of vecenarian was twofold higher in about one in ten than that of denarian at merely a half of the previous bracket.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to sculpture'
Suggestion: to sculpture
...udy the whole subjects, except learning sculpture. Furthermore, the education centre was ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87878787879 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70727222749 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5933543067 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.875 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228450868096 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101546495351 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126212088908 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163892588734 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154218244224 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.