The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers travelled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000.
The given bar chart well compare the quantity of passenger kilometers by each selected means of transport ( bicycle, motorbike, air, bus, and rail) and total of passenger kilometers in the UK between 1990 and 2000. Overall, it is noticeable that the number of passenger kilometers travelled by bicycle and motorbike decreased, whilst that of those travelled by other 3 types increased slightly.
In detail, it can be explained that there was a gentle drop in the figure of bicycle and that of motorbike by 2 billions each from 1990 to 2000. However, the proportion of distance travelled by bus and that of travelled by rail grew by 4 billions on average. Similarly, the quantity of distance travelled by air experience a rise since its passenger kilometers increased by 3 billions throughout those mentioned years. Finally, it is compelling that the proportion of passenger kilometers from all types of transportation increased from 100 billions to 110 billions a decade later.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ters by each selected means of transport bicycle, motorbike, air, bus, and rail a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, similarly, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15094339623 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99421273735 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522012578616 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3356226242 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33783676627 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159453022452 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118702729931 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295968666861 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128578715338 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.