The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005.
The chart illustrates the amount of finance paid on transportation problems by the governments of four nations, namely Italia, Portugal, the UK, and the USA over the period of 15 years from 1990 to 2005.
What stands out from the chart is that except for the United States, the amount of spending on transportation and roads of the three countries in the European region tended to decrease over the years. However, Portugal was still the most focused country on this issue. => Good!
During the past 15 years, in Europe, the percentage of finance used for road and traffic problems in the UK and Italy has fluctuated, increasing substantially in 2000, decreasing sharply in 2005 and declining by nearly 5% compared to 1990. In addition, the level of Portugal’s spending on transport showed a downward trend, this saw a significant fall to 20%, about 7% less than 15 years ago.
In the same years, the US was the only nation that continued to grow investment in transportation. In Detail, from 1990 to 1995, although there was a slight decrease in the amount of investment by nearly 2%, over ten years the figure rose from 10% in 1995 to 15%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d to grow investment in transportation. In Detail, from 1990 to 1995, although the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79797979798 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76634877379 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4109299249 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305619917006 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116541769429 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649088513136 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167607168836 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479977615584 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.