The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the information about girls and boys passing high school competency exams through 7 subjects from 2010 to 2011.
Overall, as can be seen, girls had the higher results than boys almost all the subjects surveyed, with the notable exception of geography. Another visible trend is that both genders had the similar interests in foreign languages and mathematics in 2010-2011.
Looking at the detail, schoolboys who passed chemistry account for the lowest percentage, at 14,1%; whereas the number of girls who pass this subject was 30,2%. 25,6% of young girls passing history, compared to 22,9% young boys during the period from 2010-2011. The figures for boys and girls achieved their targets in physics was higher, at 34,6% and 36,7% respectively. However, geography subject where schoolboys’ results in geography were better than girls, with 30,4% and 20,1% respectively.
Both genders obtained a significant higher proportion on foreign language and maths, which account for nearly 50% of each subject. Surprisingly, the percentage of schoolgirls passing computer science peak at the highest point, with a pass rate of 56,3%, which was over 14% higher than boys in the period from 2010 to 2011.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37305699482 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72655070872 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621761658031 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8017130257 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226028153858 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980559727254 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800168040216 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157153839015 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847087918894 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.