The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart provides information about the countries which have the most consumption and production in electricity in 2014, measured in billion kWh.
Looking from an overall prospective, it is readily apparent that the majority of electricity is consumed and even produced in two countries, firstly China at about 5 billion kWh and following with the USA around 4 billion kWh. Nonetheless, in each country, the rate of electricity production is the same as those for consumption and a bit more, except that of Germany where the rate of consumption overtook that of production.
Turning to overall trend, most of 10 countries, to be exact 9 countries, showed a management in electricity consuming while in Germany this trends is reversed with the production rate less than the consumption (526 compared to 582 billion kWh). However, if someone wanted to be more meticulous about this data, there would be much invaluable differences to compare. For example, while Russia and Korea ranked almost in boarder line with the close consumption and production of electricity, some countries like the USA and India maintained more different and even positively less consumption for electricity compared to their production rate.
All in all, the two first countries had far the most production and consumption rate rather than all other countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ion in electricity in 2014, measured in billion kWh. Looking from an overall prospecti...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28037383178 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99794671633 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556074766355 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 22.4926829268 236% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 166.541849095 43.030603864 387% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 282.5 112.824112599 250% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.5 22.9334400587 233% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 17.5 5.23603664747 334% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211626951326 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127469192333 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619718554867 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149733120039 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754813234101 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.2 13.2329268293 228% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 61.2550243902 29% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 10.3012195122 233% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.4329268293 249% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.9970731707 211% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.0658536585 217% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.