The bar chart below shows US seafood imports for 1986, 1996, and 2016, and the forecast for 2026. The pie chart shows the geographical structure of these imports in 2016.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write more than 150 words.
The graphs elucidate the information regarding seafood sourcing from foreign countries to the US in a span of 20 years from 1986 to 2016, with the prediction for 2026, and illustration of imports classified according to country of origin for the year 2016 in US.
Overall, the bar chart highlights that there was an upward trend throughout the time period, while in the future, the forecast depicts a shrink in the intake of seafood. Moreover, the pie chart outlines the three countries that contributed the major share in the US market.
At the beginning of the year 1986, the United States import level started with more than 5 billion dollars, was gradually increased to 10 billion dollars in 1996 and jumped to $20 by 2016. However, in the future, by 2016 it was predicted that there would be a decline of about 5 billion dollars from 2016 in seafood purchase.
With regard to the pie chart, it was observed that the top three dominant countries made up the largest share in the United States market share with almost more than two thirds(67%) of total. Having said that, China and Thailand being the popular countries for seafood imports to the US with rates 28% and 23% individually. In contrast, the remaining nations such as Indonesia, Vietnam, Ecuador and others accounted for nearly more than one-third(33%) of total shares.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eign countries to the US in a span of 20 years from 1986 to 2016, with the predic...
^^
Line 7, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more than one-third33% of total shares.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, third, while, in contrast, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89427312775 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57083845225 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57268722467 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1070425749 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.875 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.625 5.23603664747 222% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26816811731 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111982655559 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597249165055 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162156238124 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513353097506 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.