The bar chart compares the amount of time spent by people in the UK on three different types of phone call between 1995 and 2002

Essay topics:

The bar chart compares the amount of time spent by people in the UK on three different types of phone call between 1995 and 2002.

The chart gives data about time spent by UK phone users between 1995 and 2002 in three types of telephone calls

In terms of overall usage, local fixed lines were the most popular type, throughout the period shown. The lowest figures on the chart are for mobile calls, but this category also saw the most dramatic increase in user minutes.

Regarding local fixed line, we see that consumption rose steadily from just over 70 billion minutes in 1995 to a peak of 90 billion minutes by 1999. Output then fell gradually, declining to around the initial 70 billion minutes mark in 2002.

However, the pattern for national and international fixed line uses dramatic increased between 1995 and 2001, from around 35 billion to 60 billion. Similarly, the start level of mobile calls below 10 billion minutes, increasing to 45 billion minutes at year end.

Overall, time spent with national and international fixed line calls increases during considered period. Likewise, the mobile phones figure, except in local fixed line calls.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (3 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, likewise, regarding, similarly, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13609467456 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37448477252 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656804733728 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9188203555 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205359934506 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911286526281 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112845968281 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156415730545 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186895227486 0.0819641961636 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.