The bar chart compares the figures for 5 different phone brands in terms of sales around the world during a period 4 years.
The bar chart compares the figures for 5 different phone brands in terms of sales around the world during a period 4 years.
It is clear that from the chart the global sales of Nokia and Samsung were the highest over the research period. Additionally, while the figure of Samsung increase dramatically, the sales of Nokia considerable decreased as we can see.
In 2009, the sales of Nokia phone were highest, at around 450 million units, while the figure for Samsung was significantly lower, over 220 million devices. In 2011, whereas the number of Nokia phones were sold in worldwide market slightly fell, there was a remarkable rise in the sales of Samsung by 100 million units. Over the next two years, Nokia saw a continuous decline in the quantity of its sold phones to the same as figure of Samsung in the previous two years. By contrast, the sales of Samsung phone enormously went up to approximately 460 million mobile phones, which made Samsung become the market leader.
Turning to other three brands, Apple phone became more popular than LG and ZTE. In 2013, there was a considerable rise in its sales to nearly 150 million devices, while LG witnessed a gradual decrease in its sales to about 80 units. Finally, as we can see that the number of ZTE phones were bought by customers around the world climbed up steadily to 60 million devices in the same year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.725 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46912883872 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520833333333 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8805144641 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.4 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366792294235 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180329990081 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.275439217925 0.0843802449381 326% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351796918466 0.15604864568 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.374738547375 0.0819641961636 457% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.