The bar chart gives information about the number of car journeys into the city centre made by residents and non-residents.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph provides information about the total number of car journeys for residents and non-residents who visited the city center between 1996 and 2005. The data is in an average number of journeys per day.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given bar chart. Residents were higher than non-resident in the first four years in car journeys, which changed in reverse in the next years. Also, new parking meters had been add to the city.
To embarks with, in 1996, the number of residents who visited a city center by their cars was near 9500 journeys per day, which was five times more than non-residents. In the following three years, the rate of residents fluctuated between 9000 and 10000 journeys per day, whereas non-residents showed an upward trend from 4000 to 8500 journeys per day. There were parking meters had been added into a city center.
Furthermore, from 2000 to 2003, non-residents overtook residents in terms of car journeys it accounted that over average 7000 journeys per day in all years, which was double of residents. Moreover, in 2002, the wastegate and park lane closed due to traffic. The total number of residents and non-residents were 4000 and 2900 per day respectively in 2003. However, the resident car journey rate decreased to 2800, and the non-residents’ rate of journey inclined to 4500 journeys per day in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'added'.
Suggestion: added
...ears. Also, new parking meters had been add to the city. To embarks with, in 199...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95633187773 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70684597304 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532751091703 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.9363927212 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5833333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31482776775 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129655863723 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926193857366 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226631807714 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682659948452 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.