The bar chart illustrates the number of people in the UK eating more than 5 portions of vegetables and fish per day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The graph provides information about how many percentages of three groups (women, men, and children) have five portions or more of vegetables and fish in a day. From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the number of females and males consuming five portions or more of fish and vegies per day experienced an upward trend. Meanwhile, the figure for children showed a slight change.

Regarding the female group, approximately 20% of women had consumed five portions or more of fish and vegetables in a day between 2011 and 2013, increasing by 15% in the next two years and picking up at around 32% in 2016. Although the figure then decreased by approximately 7% in the final year, the female group still accounted as the highest figure among its counterparts. In the initial year, the number of children who followed this diet was half that of the women group, and it did not change much throughout the years and reached just about 15% in the final year.

Moving to the male group, the figure showed a considerable change. It commenced at around 17% in 2011, slightly moving to about 19% in the next two years. Then, In 2015, as many as 22% of males ate 5 portions or more of vegetables and fish daily and increasing to about 14% in 2015 and moving down to an almost similar figure of 2014 in 2016. In the final year, more than 25% of men followed this eating habit.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nge. It commenced at around 17% in 2011, slightly moving to about 19% in the next...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, still, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60728744939 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52947352739 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522267206478 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.089241689 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154719759791 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640399300581 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635367394671 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117405500158 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527283554258 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.