The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.
The given bar chart gives information about the proportion of people who got divorce in two different countries between 2011 and 2015.
It is clear from the charts that the percentage of divorce rates for Sweden are much higher than those for Finland over the period shown before it suddenly fell down in 2015. Overall, the chart shows an downward trend in divorce rates in Sweden from 2011 to 2015, while in Finland, the rates went down in 2012 before peaked in 2014 and remained stable in 2015.
In 2011, around 47% people in Finland got divorce, while the number of these people in Sweden stood just nearly 45%. Until 2012, the figure for divorce rates in Finland decreased in under 32% and rose dramatically under 40% in 2013 before it peaked at 41% in 2014. In contrast, from 2011 to 2015, the divorce rates in Sweden escalated considerably to nearly 50% in 2012 before dropping to 45% in 2014.
After 2014, the proportions for people that ended their civil partnership in Finland remained at a similar levels, while the rates of people who got divorce in Sweden dropped significantly to 38% through a year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... down in 2015. Overall, the chart shows an downward trend in divorce rates in Swed...
^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...den escalated considerably to nearly 50% in 2012 before dropping to 45% in 2014. ...
^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'level'?
Suggestion: level
...ership in Finland remained at a similar levels, while the rates of people who got divo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73333333333 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33319244432 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.9271692193 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360646728556 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185531890725 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125303240825 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22930484972 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12105690344 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.