The bar chart shows the percentage of small , medium, large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016.
The bar chart compares the social media appearance proportion of 3 levels of businesses over the period of 5 years starting from 2012.
It is clear that the overall trend was upward except for a sharp decrease in 2015. Additionally, large businesses spent a significantly larger percentage of budgets on social media for commercial purposes than their counterparts.
From 2012 to 2014, the presence proportion on social media of giant companies was considerably stable (about 78%), after which it suddenly plunged to 52% in 2014. Just one year later, the figure surged to roughly 80%, which is higher than the starting percentage.
In terms of small and medium businesses, they appeared less on social media for trading purposes. The percentage of these 2 types of business started at about 28% and 32% respectively, at which point both of them rose to 35% and nearly 50% in 2014. Then, they all experienced a dramatic fall to 30% in the next year. After dropping, the figure for small and medium companies jumped up to merely 50% and 52% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...year later, the figure surged to roughly 80%, which is higher than the starting p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96610169492 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79920555252 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632768361582 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9591526984 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357149631332 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12775576786 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882170634113 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198892463543 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376363549034 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.