The bar chart shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014
The bar graph illustrates the amount of electricity generated and used in the top ten countries in 2014, measured in billion kWh.
Overall, most nations produced more electricity than they consumed except Germany, with a significant amount in China and the US, while Korea Republic had the least in both categories.
For production volume, the value was remarkedly high in China (5398 billion kWh) and the United States (4099 billion kWh) while the least amount of 485.1 billion kWh and 526.6 billion kWh were generated from by the Koreans and Brazilians respectively. In addition, the quantity generated from other nations fluctuated between 526.6 and 1057 billion kWh, a range about five times less than the volume generated in the highest producing nations.
Consumption, similarly, had the same pattern with the Chinese and Americans using more electricity than any other nation while Korea Republic was the least consumer at 449.5 billion kWh, a value ten times less than that of China. Interestingly, of all the ten countries, Germany was the only exemption using more electricity than produced by the country in 2014.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... top ten countries in 2014, measured in billion kWh. Overall, most nations produced ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25414364641 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68445755854 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2418157797 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.2 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.2 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156787487095 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987198338417 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082449025548 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130196770832 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118520539226 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 61.2550243902 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.