The bar charts below show the percentages of men and women in employment in three countries in 2005 and 2015.
The bar charts illustrate the information about the ratio of job comparison of the male and female in three various countries Canada, South Korea, and Sweden with a decade difference in 2005 and 2015.
Overall, the men ratio was significantly higher all countries in both years. South Korea had provide least jobs to women both time while in other countries employment was considerably improved for women.
The graph clearly shows that in 2005 men had approximately twofold in each country. Canada create 60% of jobs for men while the women had merely under 40% of jobs. South Korea had around 75% of jobs males and 30% for female which was lower than other countries in 2005. In Sweden man was just bellow 80% of jobs proportion although women was just above of men.
In 2015 male had seen only 10% increase of in comparison of 2005 while women seen twofold of men. In South Korea, both gender jobs had tiny uprise around 3% in each. However, in Sweden, male jobs were reduced from 80% to exactly 70% while women increased 5% in 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'provide the least'.
Suggestion: provide the least
...ountries in both years. South Korea had provide least jobs to women both time while in other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... jobs to women both time while in other countries employment was considerably improved fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...f 2005 while women seen twofold of men. In South Korea, both gender jobs had tiny ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71038251366 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32345202985 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2658241324 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274466104982 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113850834885 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618934813663 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177315059835 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341869578899 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.