The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city – London, and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013.
The bar chart compares the average house prices in England and the urban city- London. In addition, the average house prices in other areas of England in 2013.
Overall it is clear that the average house prices in England were the lowest. By contrast, The number of money houses in the capital-London was the highest during the period show. It was noticeable that North East become a less popular choice in 2013.
We can see that London increased significantly at around 1300000 pound in 1995, at which point this figure started to rose sharply nearly 200000 pound during the period show. Besides, England accounted for a very large proportion with by 200000 pound in 1995, we seen a significant increase in the average house prices in 2013, reached a peak of some around 42000000 pound over the whole 8-year-period show.
Around 4000000 pound the average house prices of London. While the figure for South East and South West accounted for 3200000 pround, 2700000 pound, respectively. The percentage of spending bought the house was a drop in Midlands, accounted for a very small proportion just around 1200000 pound throughout the period show.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...become a less popular choice in 2013. We can see that London increased signifi...
^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...creased significantly at around 1300000 pound in 1995, at which point this figure sta...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...e started to rose sharply nearly 200000 pound during the period show. Besides, Englan...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... a very large proportion with by 200000 pound in 1995, we seen a significant increase...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'saw'?
Suggestion: saw
...ortion with by 200000 pound in 1995, we seen a significant increase in the average h...
^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... reached a peak of some around 42000000 pound over the whole 8-year-period show. Ar...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...t accounted for 3200000 pround, 2700000 pound, respectively. The percentage of spendi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...ry small proportion just around 1200000 pound throughout the period show.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02617801047 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49706936037 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.7811305199 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326099870194 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188008278042 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166936948651 0.0843802449381 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262087132967 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187878043628 0.0819641961636 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.