The bar graph shows net national income (that's the income earned by the various factors of production in the economy, after the loss of used-up capital equipment has been accounted for) in per capita terms.
The bar charts provide the information about the percentage of people using multiple social networking sites in canada for the year of 2014 and 2015.
The comparison among multiple social networking usage is relatively increased from one platforms to two platforms. Meanwhile, the multiple sites usage shows a decreasing trend from two sites to five sites. The multiple networking sites usage in canada grew slightly about one to four percent from the year of 2014 to 2015.
Highest percentage of people using networking sites is categorized in one platform user which is slightly declined from 36% to 28% in respective years. People who use more than one platform are gradually decreased respectively from two platform suser to five platforms user, and also the number rises from 2014 to 2015. Conversely, the percentage of users who have one site or do not have it at all are dropped slowly in 2015. In addition, the chart indicates lesser contrast between 2014 and 2015 for the two platforms user and non user.
Therefore, the data illustrates that people tend to have more than one site platform for social networking subsequently. Likewise, social networking is dominated by one platform users and two plaforms users in respective years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sites'' or 'site's'?
Suggestion: sites'; site's
... two platforms. Meanwhile, the multiple sites usage shows a decreasing trend from two...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Highest'.
Suggestion: The Highest
...rcent from the year of 2014 to 2015. Highest percentage of people using networking s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, likewise, so, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16748768473 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70705679118 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.1214186416 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.9 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0351289115631 0.215688989381 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0195165248314 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221146659843 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0323320614626 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258310261681 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.