The given bar chart illustrates the number of vehicles in China. An interesting point to be noted that in 1999 the the ownership of vehicles in China was the highest.
Overall analysis, the minimum number of cars observed in 1987 and after that this number increased steadily until 1999. Additionally, the number of vehicle is measured in per thousand people. Furthermore, Y axis represents the numbers while the years are indicated by X axis.
It is manifest that, when it comes to the number of vehicle owned by Chinese people, it began at close to 250 in 1987 and then peaked at just above 4000 in 1999. Moreover, this number climbed dramatically from about 1000 to approximately 2000 between 1993 and 1995.
Stating further, in 1989, the car count was 500 whereas this number jumped to just below 3000 in 1997. In addition, until 1993, the vehicle number was under 1000 but after that it increased sharply upto 1999.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...eresting point to be noted that in 1999 the the ownership of vehicles in China was the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...eresting point to be noted that in 1999 the the ownership of vehicles in China was the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84905660377 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53013169494 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.952633349 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6666666667 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101537507339 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536463942438 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543982041403 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766075559412 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698834632177 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.