The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 according to United Nations statistics.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart which refers to the United Nations (UN) statistics illustrates that the distinction between birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020.
Generally, the number of birth since 1970 to 2020 relatively growth significantly. In contrast, over the period the number of death lean to fluctuate sluggishly. Specifically, the highest birth rates predicted in 2020 which reach to more than three millions of people, while the lowest of death rates also predicted at the same time which just less than 1 millions of people.
During 1970 to 1980, the number of birth experienced plateau, a little more than 1 millions of people. Furthermore, since 1990 to 2020 the number of birth gravitate to jump up extremely, reach to more than 1 millions of people. On the other hand, over 1990 to 2020 the number of death tend to decline slightly, from around 1,3 to less than 1 millions of peoples.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'three million'.
Suggestion: three million
...dicted in 2020 which reach to more than three millions of people, while the lowest of death rates...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...d at the same time which just less than 1 millions of people. During 1970 to 1980, the num...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...experienced plateau, a little more than 1 millions of people. Furthermore, since 1990 to 2020...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...o jump up extremely, reach to more than 1 millions of people. On the other hand, over 1990 to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
... slightly, from around 1,3 to less than 1 millions of peoples.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90196078431 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70020875937 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496732026144 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5707259897 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1841283884 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102361725165 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849128952835 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169993970464 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953883963124 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.