The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the increase of urban population in certain parts of the world and projected growth by 2030.
Overall, the proportion of the population living in cities in all survey areas as well as whole world in 2000 have significant rise in comparison with 1950. It is forecasted to increase further by 2030.
In 1950, the percentage of urban dwellers in the world stood at 30%, but by 2000 almost half of the world’s population lived in urban areas. By 2030 the figure is expected to rise to 60%. Latin America had the highest proportion of people living in cities and towns, rising from roughly 40% in 1950 to 70% in 2000, with a predicted further increase to 80% in 2030.
The figures and trends for Africa and Asia are similar. In 1950, about 12% of the population in Asia is urban dwellers while the figure for Africa is lower with 11%. However, in 2000, both Africa and Asia registered the same figure for the rate of urban population that is nearly 40%. By 2030, the figures of Africa and Asia are projected to continue to rise and reach 50% and 55%, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In 1950, about 12% of the population in Asia is urban dwellers while the figure ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62051282051 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4287668914 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497435897436 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4259139224 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139953757547 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624837072072 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773186302825 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115970742274 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812135868666 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.