The chart below gives information about the level oof education of Bulgarian people who wanted to go and live in another country in 2002, 2006 and 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart shows that the level of education of people who intended to leave Bulgaria for another nation in 2002, 2006 and 2008.
The number of people with higher education level rose in 2006 but fell in 2008. Secondary education was always the highest in every year. Both higher education and primary and lower education categories rose in 2006. The figure for people with higher education was lower in 2008 than in 2002. The number of people with primary and lower education rose all three years. The figure for secondary education was a lot lower in 2008 than in 2006.
Overall, the chart indicates that Bulgarian emigrants' education background was improving gradually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d lower education rose all three years. The figure for secondary education was a lo...
^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'emigrants'' or 'emigrant's'?
Suggestion: emigrants'; emigrant's
...all, the chart indicates that Bulgarian emigrants education background was improving grad...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 565.0 965.302439024 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 113.0 196.424390244 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.2603904387 3.73543355544 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3534166597 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 55.0 106.607317073 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486725663717 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 171.9 283.868780488 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.9925582052 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.625 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.125 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219373288197 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117729008633 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658297658531 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169624503039 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680992841577 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.