The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provides the information about the percentage of people using multiple social networking sites in Canada for the year of 2014 and 2015.
The comparison among multiple social networking usage is relatively increased from one sites to two sites. Meanwhile, the multiple sites usage shows a decreasing trend from two sites to five sites. The multiple networking sites usage in Canada grew slightly about one to four percent from the year of 2014 to 2015.
The highest percentage of people using networking sites is categorized in one site user which is slightly declined from 36% to 28% in respective years. The number of people who use more than one platform are gradually decreased respectively from two sites user to five sites user, and also the number rises from 2014 to 2015. Conversely, the percentage of users who have one site or do not have it at all are dropped slowly in 2015. In addition, the chart indicates lesser contrast between 2014 and 2015 for the two sites user and no site user.
Therefore, the data illustrates that people tend to have more than one site platform for social networking subsequently. Likewise, social networking is dominated by one site and two sites users in respective years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'provide'.
Suggestion: provide
The bar charts provides the information about the percentage of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...anada for the year of 2014 and 2015. the highest percentage of people using netw...
^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sites'' or 'site's'?
Suggestion: sites'; site's
... and 2015 for the two sites user and no sites user. Therefore, the data illustrate...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...orm for social networking subsequently. also, social networking is dominated by one ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90967741935 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6211022298 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6700678182 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275863247935 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161115323443 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105897016585 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247743106748 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114472193549 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.