The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2018, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2018, and future projections for 2025.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The mentioned bar chart reflects the data of three main exports namely: International tourism, Dairy products and Meat products in Southland during three different years.

Overall, the International tourism showed an increase trend whereas the dairy products have fluctuation in three different years. In contrast, the Meat products have reflected decline trend.

As it can be seen in the chart, the international tourism in the year 2000 was nearly 8 billion and currently is has increased slightly by 1 billion. And, it is predicted to increase up to 10 billion by the year 2025.Similarly, the dairy products had accounted for 27 billion in the year 2000 but now it has reached to its peak value (10 billion). Also, it has been claimed that it will decrease slightly below 10 billion by the year 2025. Interestingly, a different pattern is shown by Meat products. In the year 2000, it has a value of 6 billion and is decreasing slowly with a value of nearly below 6 billion. In addition to this, it is projected that meat products will have its amount to 5 billion.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similarly
...rease up to 10 billion by the year 2025.Similarly, the dairy products had accounted for 2...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86885245902 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86459741696 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513661202186 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5964068751 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879367830966 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385380049379 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333668989298 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.059066744688 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443083976863 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.