The chart below gives information about trends in internet use by females in the USA in two years.
The given chart compares the proportional change in relation to the usage of internet services by the female population of different ages in the USA over a time period of 2 years from 200 to 2001.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the trend of using the internet dropped gradually with age across both the years. However, the proportion of teens and youngsters was maximum in this context.
According to the given illustration, leading the chart in 2000, the youngest group topped the list with 90% internet users. Whilst 88% of the teens were recorded, nearly 8 in every 10 young girls (19-24) preferred using internet, and merely 77% of the middle-aged women opted for the same. However, a steady decline brought down the percentage of women in their mid-forties under 70%. Also, in the case of 65 and above, only 2 out of 10 aged women were interested in the internet.
On the contrary, a reverse trend was witnessed in the youngest and teen group in 2001. The former slipped slightly by 1%, while a dramatic rise in the latter climbed the proportion to 100%. On the other hand, a similar trend for 19 to 24 aged girls maintained the proportional rate as it was during the previous year and leveled off the same rate for 25 to 35 age group as well. Although other groups rose gradually in 2001 by nearly 10%, the overall pattern followed a sharp plunge, as only 3 to 5 (56 and above) in every 10 women loved using the internet.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, well, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68199233716 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54422863319 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567049808429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9921283454 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.090909091 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173356219161 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615019623821 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545680873022 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116393519582 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430198000487 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, well, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68199233716 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54422863319 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567049808429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9921283454 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.090909091 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173356219161 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615019623821 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545680873022 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116393519582 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430198000487 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.