The chart below show the percentage of fatal accidents by locations in a European country. The survey was conducted in 2000.
The given bar chart shows that the percetage of fatal accidents by locations in European country amd the survey was conducted in 2000.
The chart showed that there wers two areas, first rural area and second urban area. There were percentage of fatal crashes by loaction and speed limit ( miles per hour ). On the 30 mph or less speed 21% fatal crashes caused in rural area which was very low and otherside in urban area there were extreme condition was 72% crashes. After that 30-40 mph speed there were 31% accident caused in rural area and same speed in urban area 69% accident caused. 45-50mph speed limit there were approximately 49% at fatal crashes in both locations. We can see that the speed incresed that time rural area fatal accident percentage also increased and same hand in urban area it was decreased. Rural area had 81% accident caused when speed limit was 55 mph but surprisingly in urban area only 19% accident caused. Ar last 70% fatal crashes in rural area when speed limit was 60 mph or higher, other side in urban area just 29% fatal crashes done.
All in one, when speed limit was low then in rural area accident caused very less but in urban area when speed was very low that time many accidents on that speed limit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atal crashes by loaction and speed limit miles per hour . On the 30 mph or less s...
^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...loaction and speed limit miles per hour . On the 30 mph or less speed 21% fatal c...
^^
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mit was 55 mph but surprisingly in urban area only 19% accident caused. Ar last 7...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6036036036 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.06318966497 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463963963964 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2453415094 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230583036842 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13470216031 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144434574714 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266026979067 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.210557288098 0.0819641961636 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.