The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
You should write at least 150 words.
The charts illustrates how much money was wasted on photographic film, toys, CDs, perfumes, tennis racquets and personal stereos by Britain, France, Italy and Germany.
Overall, Britain spent more money on six consumer goods in contrast with Germany, which waste less amount of money than others.
British's expenditure on photographic film was spent 170 pound sterling, which is the highest spent among all items. They waste on toys, CDs and perfumes about 167 pounds, 165 pounds and 160 pounds respectively. The United Kingdom and Italy both purchased the same amount on tennis racquets(155 pounds). Britain took their leadership in buying personal stereos too.
In comparison with other European countries Germany spent only 450 pound sterling on photographic film, perfumes and tennis racquets in the similar share. Spending on toys and CDs are equal and contained 145 pounds each. French wasted less on perfumes(approximately 148 pounds) and tennis racquets(exactly 145 pounds) and gave priority to photographic film (165 pounds).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The charts illustrates how much money was wasted on photograp...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts illustrates how much money was wasted on photographic film, toys, CDs, perfume...
^^
Line 13, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...in buying personal stereos too. In comparison with other European countries Germany s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61392405063 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90290452318 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1338390015 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0673475819764 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294323462554 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364078562328 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506364274279 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391076717012 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.