The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015

The bar chart illustrates the production of rice yearly in 4 different nations in 1995,2005 and 2015.

Overall, what stands out from the graph is that nation A produced the largest amount of rice in the three years mentioned while the lowest million tones rice manufactured was in country D during the same period
Looking at the graph for more details, country A reached a peak at 50 million tonnes in 2015 while more than 40 rice products were produced by nation B at the same time. In addition, the first place in country B was in 2005, however, it just equals the first runner-up in country A with nearly 50 million tonnes. Moreover, in 1995, the production of rice in both nations A and B even created a few and stands in last place with about 45 and 35, respectively.

On the other hand, countries C and D produced rice smaller than the 2 countries above and the highest figure in those countries was about 5 times as low as countries A and B. In nation D, the manufacture of rice in 1995 was the same as that in 2005, with nearly 5 million tonnes.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart illustrates the production...
^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... three years mentioned while the lowest million tones rice manufactured was in country ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42857142857 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50260172825 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515306122449 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.0514908208 43.030603864 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.666666667 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326149016916 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191387097059 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975490430453 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240643327757 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108016895903 0.0819641961636 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.01 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.