The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell phones) in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro.
The line chart provides information about the average cost of monthly contracts for various cell phones in European county between January to September in the year 2002. The data is the number of euros per month.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given line graph that Alpha increased drastically in the period, which was at the first position at the end. And Sim tx was at the last place at the end of the given period.
To comments with, as regards Domo, accounted for nearly 15 euros in January, after reaching a peak of 25 euros in August, which decreased to around 23 euros in September. Moreover, the proportion of Lex was around 11 euros in the starting month, which increased by over 15 euros by September.
Furthermore, the initial figure of Sim tx comprised approximately at the beginning, which delined to close to 6 euros in the last month before it reached over 10 euros in June. Lastly, the rate of Alpha was the lowest in January with 5 euros, which started an upward trend in the following days. It became the most costlier mobile contract by the end with a rate of close to 25 euros in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'costlier' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: costlier
...nd in the following days. It became the most costlier mobile contract by the end with a rate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, lastly, moreover, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58208955224 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46986741414 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562189054726 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2327315116 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242954379594 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106939780657 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113317080868 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165143254876 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147847863469 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.