The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2013-2012.
The line graph illustrates us about the various crime rates in the Newport city centre between 2003 and 2012.
Almost 3400 numbers of incidents were reported in the year 2003. There was seen a rising trend of these incidents around 3700 in 2004 before declining to 1200 in 2008. After that period, the rate increased slightly to nearly 1500 in the year 2009 and plateaued at the same rate with the passage of the following years. Finally, in 2002, it reached slightly less than 1500 incidents.
Furthermore, car theft was the second highest as accounted for approximately 2700 incidents. This rate had fallen in 2006 at around 2000 incidents after that it rose dramatically at slightly more than 2500 incidents in 2010. At last, it reached a peak at about 2800 incidents in the year 2012. In contrast, the robbery rate amounted at 600 incidents far less than burglary or car theft and after some fluctuation throughout the years, it reached almost at a similar rate where it started in 2012.
Overall, burglary made up the highest crime rate, whereas robbery made the lowest crime rate in all the previously mentioned years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e rate increased slightly to nearly 1500 in the year 2009 and plateaued at the sa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, second, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90625 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49511240979 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8187756875 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0675082366893 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320281676005 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059954669005 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704505122498 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788781463806 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.