The chart below shows the energy (million unites) generated by wind in four different countries in 1985 and 2000.
The bar chart demonstrates the production of energy from wind in four different nations from 1985 to 2000. (measured in million of units)
It is clear that The US is the biggest producer of wind energy throughout the period whereas the opposite pattern could be seen in Denmark. In addition, every nation was similar in terms of upwards trends with the exception of Germany.
In 1985, The United States generated up to 120 million energy unit in comparison with Denmark’s figure of approximately 10 million units. In the following 15 years, the United States’ wind energy output rose by 20 million units, reaching to 140 and Denmark’s also doubled, reaching to 20 million units.
When it comes to other nations’ production, the figure for Germany was 60 million unites, twice as much as the one for India in 1985. Nonetheless, at the end of the given time phase, India produced more with whilst Germany produced less, making the two nations’ total numbers of units equivalent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Measured
...ur different nations from 1985 to 2000. measured in million of units It is clear that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... nations from 1985 to 2000. measured in million of units It is clear that The US is...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in million of units It is clear that The US is the biggest producer of wind e...
^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
... was similar in terms of upwards trends with the exception of Germany. In 1985, The United States ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...gure of approximately 10 million units. In the following 15 years, the United Stat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nonetheless, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12727272727 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87802860801 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624242424242 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4472894702 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310680212433 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141902300117 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115275031144 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195318774438 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150053898963 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.