The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparsions where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparsions where relevant.

The bar graph reveals about representation the information GDP upsurge per year.It has given three nations between 2007 to 2010.

According to the bar chart,it is clearly seen that in 2007 Tunisia had higher proportion in the chart as well as anyone countries like 6 each half.Therefore,in 2008 to 2010 tunica was decline year by year.

Form the other side, in 2007 japan had very lowest percentage but also in 2008 japan was climb up 4 proportion all in all in 2009 was near rose percentage 5.After that,in 2010 japan had fallen up proportion on the
chart.Moreover,in 2007 Educador was
i plummet ratio 2 percentage as far as after year Ecuador was rocket 4 percentage.Lastly in 2009 to 2010 Ecuador was similar percentage.

To sum up, in begin japan had very fall down proportion consists japan was growth up in 2010.Thus,Tunisia had started very well down than after years reduce day by day.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...on the information GDP upsurge per year.It has given three nations between 2007 t...
^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... year.It has given three nations between 2007 to 2010. According to the bar c...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n three nations between 2007 to 2010. According to the bar chart,it is clearly...
^^^
Line 4, column 27, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... to 2010. According to the bar chart,it is clearly seen that in 2007 Tunisia ha...
^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ll as anyone countries like 6 each half.Therefore,in 2008 to 2010 tunica was decline yea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...one countries like 6 each half.Therefore,in 2008 to 2010 tunica was decline year b...
^^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efore,in 2008 to 2010 tunica was decline year by year. Form the other side, in...
^^
Line 6, column 112, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'all in'.
Suggestion: all in
...in 2008 japan was climb up 4 proportion all in all in 2009 was near rose percentage 5.After t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
... all in 2009 was near rose percentage 5.After that,in 2010 japan had fallen up propor...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...09 was near rose percentage 5.After that,in 2010 japan had fallen up proportion on ...
^^^
Line 6, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...10 japan had fallen up proportion on the chart.Moreover,in 2007 Educador was i p...
^^^
Line 7, column 7, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...had fallen up proportion on the chart.Moreover,in 2007 Educador was i plummet ratio 2...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...en up proportion on the chart.Moreover,in 2007 Educador was i plummet ratio 2 pe...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... chart.Moreover,in 2007 Educador was i plummet ratio 2 percentage as far as af...
^
Line 8, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Lastly
...er year Ecuador was rocket 4 percentage.Lastly in 2009 to 2010 Ecuador was similar per...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 36, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'fallen'.
Suggestion: fallen
... To sum up, in begin japan had very fall down proportion consists japan was grow...
^^^^
Line 11, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...on consists japan was growth up in 2010.Thus,Tunisia had started very well down than...
^^^^
Line 11, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Tunisia
...onsists japan was growth up in 2010.Thus,Tunisia had started very well down than after y...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d very well down than after years reduce day by day.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as well as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95424836601 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.112525081 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.4946606608 43.030603864 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.5 112.824112599 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.25 22.9334400587 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 19.25 5.23603664747 368% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 19.0 1.69756097561 1119% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163741741459 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129104832339 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798593787442 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103729677371 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768304930984 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.