The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart illustrates the information about people behaviour in the United States of America towards eating in restaurants, with comparison of three years habbit of eaten in restaurant 2003, 2006, and 2013.
Overall, the majority of people was prefer to ate in outdoor in a restaurants in a week and one to two time in a month. However, the number of people went to restaurant on daily base was almost similar to those how's did not attend any meal on restaurant. The ratio was fluctuating in different years.
The graph shows that the ratio of people who ate everyday from restaurant was less than 5% in each year, in 2003 it maximum and after deceased. People who went to eat outside was 15% to 20% and in 2006 the number people was touched their peak. Once in a week and twice in a month ratio was between 25% to 35%. In 2006 only 25% people visited restaurant in month. People who rearly visit outdoor eating facilities was less 15%, however it was less 15% in 2003. Less than 5% people did not go to restaurant in their life while in 2003 it was exactly 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a restaurant' or simply 'restaurants'?
Suggestion: a restaurant; restaurants
... people was prefer to ate in outdoor in a restaurants in a week and one to two time in a mont...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: how's
... daily base was almost similar to those hows did not attend any meal on restaurant. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... shows that the ratio of people who ate everyday from restaurant was less than 5% in eac...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4693877551 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40958968478 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7187328595 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231635532707 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101264308654 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542268340718 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159083571997 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151757704476 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.