The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart gives information about how often the US citizens had a meal at fast food outlets in the years 2003, 2006 and 2011.
Overall, the percentage of people eating fast food once a week was highest in 2003 and 2006, while in 2013, most citizens in the USA consumed this food once or twice a month. It was noting that there were few people who had fast food everyday or never tried it.
The proportion of people eating at fast food establishments several times a week was around 17% in 2003, then increased by 3% after 3 years and decreased to 16% in 2013. Similarly, the figure of people having junk food once a week experienced a fluctuated trend, which started at 32% in 2003 and fell to 26% in 2013. Meanwhile, the USA saw its percentage of citizens eating fast food once or twice a month decrease by around 5% from 2003 to 2006, then rise relatively by nearly 8% after 7 years.
When it comes to other groups, just around 4% of people consumed fast food on a daily basis in 2003. The figure then decreased by 1% in 2006 and remained unchanged the next 7 years. Likewise, the percentage of people who never had junk food was low and fell by around 1%. On the other hand, nearly 13% citizens in the USA ate fast food a few times a year in 2003, then the figure increased to 15% in 2006 and remained stable after 7 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...there were few people who had fast food everyday or never tried it. The proportion of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'had' and 'junk'.
Suggestion: had never junk
... Likewise, the percentage of people who never had junk food was low and fell by around 1%. On ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, similarly, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31349206349 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30049235038 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468253968254 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9098931679 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.7 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307607459848 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140554628751 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593754500388 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210977270423 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021264851625 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.