The chart describe the increase or decrase in approximate building expenses in New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt and London from 1990 to 2002 contrast with the expense in 1989.
Overall, in the first section of period, biggest part of the prices were lower while most of the prices in the second section are higher than 1989. Frankfurt was had the expensive prices in the beginning although it was had the cheapest at the end.
To begin with the first 5 years, percentages of changes in the house prices in New York, London and Tokyo were less than prices in 1989. (Respectively -5%, well over -5% and well over -5%). Charges of the houses in Madrid and Frankfurt were increase in between 1990 and 1995 even though they could not reached 5%.
In the second 5 years, biggest change was occured in the house expenses in London and it was more than 10%. However, average prices in Tokyo and Frankfurt were almost remained constant since 12 years. Despite of these, New York’s prices were exceeded the negative band and it was rosen up to almost 5%. The last city, Madrid, was not had huge changing, it was just increase to slightly under the 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'describes'.
Suggestion: describes
The chart describe the increase or decrase in approximate ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the biggest'.
Suggestion: , the biggest
... Overall, in the first section of period, biggest part of the prices were lower while mos...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'reach'
Suggestion: reach
...990 and 1995 even though they could not reached 5%. In the second 5 years, biggest c...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the biggest'.
Suggestion: , the biggest
...not reached 5%. In the second 5 years, biggest change was occured in the house expense...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0%. However, average prices in Tokyo and Frankfurt were almost remained constant ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, well, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68965517241 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22368918985 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507389162562 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9296219231 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166912375494 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701429552208 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505922107556 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107230684472 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380769914557 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.