The chart below shows information about the
problems people have when they go to live in
other countries.
Summarise the information by selecting
and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
I need to fix the details, please
The bar chart illustrates three main effects that people normally have when they are living in other countries in each ages.
Overall, we can see that the percentage for sorting out finances and sorting out healthcare are always higher than the other in each aged group.
Starting with the youngest group from 18 to 34 years old, the figures for sorting out finances and sorting out healthcare were accounted for nearly 35 percent and about 32 percent respectively while finding schools for their children was remarkbly smaller, at around 5 percent. Similarly, the middle aged group had the same trend with the first group, but these figures were the highest in the statistic. Specifically, sorting out finances was exactly 35 percent, sorting out healthcare reached a peak of more than 35 percent and the last problem was almost 20 percent. Last but not least, the problems about finances and healthcare still had a huge effect on the oldest aged group. However, finding schools for their children reached the lowest number at around 2 percent which showed that they did not have many difficulties in this aspect.
In conclusion, it is clear that the majority problem that people normally face when they are living in other country are sorting out finances and healthcare whild finding schools for children not affect much.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, similarly, so, still, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03636363636 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43084517493 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540909090909 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0851005676 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127783627157 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795791376755 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937486370235 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131218366437 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10670923692 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.