The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feautres and make comparisons where relevant.
The particular bar chart given illustrates the amount of males and females through higher education in Britain during typical years (to be exact: 1970/71, 1980/81 and 1990/91) in terms of full-time and part-time education.
It is evident from the graph that, males who were in full-time education increased slightly after gradual decline in 1970/71 pointing about more than 800000 in 1980/81 and less than 850000 in 1990/91 respectively, whereas the females in this category enjoyed from exponential increment in its all time (more than 650000 in 1970/71 and less than 1200000 in 1990/91 respectively). However, both of them in category full-time education rised considerably.
Regarding the category full-time education it is readily apparent that men increased gradually from approximately 100000 to 120000 in the former years before reaching the highest amount among the other years over the females. Likewise, females revealed its high numbers being lower than males marginally in 1990/91 about 210000 respectively.
In summary, it can easily be deduced that females in part-time education took the precedence over the males whilst males showed its upward trend in the category full-time education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... It is evident from the graph that, males who were in full-time education in...
^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess than 850000 in 1990/91 respectively, whereas the females in this category enj...
^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...200000 in 1990/91 respectively. However, both of them in category full-time educa...
^^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out 210000 respectively. In summary, it can easily be deduced that females in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, regarding, whereas, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60109289617 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7276354636 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.7195257777 43.030603864 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.833333333 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188063322369 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111517867563 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519906581685 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134012866559 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336978586525 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.