The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they studying full-time or part-time.
The diagram gives an information about higher students, male and female, in UK who preferred to study full-time or part-time during three periods of time, 1970/71, 1980/81, and 1990/91. Overall, it can be seen that students intended to choose part-time study than full-time study. In the male figure, the part-time study has fluctuated and the full-time study is increased. On the other hand, both full time and part-time study are increased.
In female figure of 1990/91, students who choose part-time study reach the peak about 1.5 million of student. This number is increase comparing with previous periods 1970/71 and 1980/81 about 780 thousands and 820 thousand in respectively. On the other hand, full-time study also rose steadily and reached the peak about 250 thousand in 1990/91.
In the male figure of 1970/71, students who choose part-time reached a peak about 1 million. This numbers became fluctuated following periods about 850 thousand in 1980/81 and 900 thousand in 1990/91. Then, for full-time study is increasing steadily from 100 thousand in 1970/71 to 210 thousand in 1990/91.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...y is increased. On the other hand, both full time and part-time study are increased. I...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59880035118 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4862679904 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30911571655 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176646073611 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100054492474 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234627503636 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118632319745 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.