The bar chart demonstrates how many visitors used three main airports, recorded in millions of passengers a year, in New York City from 1995 to 2000. The airports include John F. Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark.
It is obvious from the data that the majority of people chose to travel by LaGuardia airport over 6 years.
In 2000, the number of visits of Laguardia airport accounted for about 70 million persons and was more than that of the other airport by 30 millions or less. Newark airport has the least visits number at around 41 million passengers and the second was John F. Kennedy airport. A similar pattern was repeated in 1995 and 1996. The one difference is that the amount of travellers in each airport was less than at the end by 25 millions or more.
A notable feature is that the pattern of passenger number in 1998 and 1999 was the same. It is that the most popular airport was LaGuardia and followed by Newark and John F. Kennedy airport at around 50, 40 and 35 millions respectively. In 1997, this was only one year that John F. Kennedy airport was the top of passengers number at 45 million persons while LaGuardia airport became the second.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun millions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... of the other airport by 30 millions or less. Newark airport has the least visits nu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64251207729 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42995649292 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2446764448 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.9230769231 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9230769231 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.61538461538 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242027832686 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863606667046 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720448478133 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169067156487 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07933660072 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.