The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the given bar chart reveals the number of accidents and injured commuters per 100 million passenger miles travelled(PMT) by means of vehicle in the year 2002.
Overall, demand response is the mean of transport which is headed in both incidents and injuries. In addition, it seems that commuter rail is the safest type of transport in 2002.
It is evident from the provided information that demand response was the most dangerous among other vehicles, it was responsible for 225 unit in accidents and 173 unit in injuries. In stark contrast, with regard to commuter rail, there were merely 20 unit in incident, while the figure for injuries was slightly slower, at 17 PMT.
It is interesting to note that, in 2002, bus and light rail had the same figure for accidents, both standing at 76 PMT unit. In tern of injuries, yet, the figure for bus was significantly higher than light rail. The former was almost twofold to latter, representing at 66 and 39 respectively. On the other hand, the data of heavy rail was markedly lower than the two above, there was merely 51 PMT in incidents, while the figure for injuries was 35 unit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le the figure for injuries was 35 unit.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74371859296 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60412075623 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587939698492 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0246833413 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129708367743 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616561382665 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644733131368 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10550752705 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726697301414 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.