The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart demonstrates the count of the accidents and events caused by commuter rail, heavy rail, light rail, bus, and demand response per billion passenger miles traveled in the year 2002.
Overall, there are more incidents rather than accidents for every means of transport, whereas the commuter rail is the safest mode to travel and the demand response are less secured.
According to the chart, commuter rails are secured means and has nearly 22 conflicts and 20 disasters, which is minimal than other methods. In heavy-rail, there are more events than the accidents, It has 50 incidents and nearly 40 injuries in 100 million PMT. The incidents are double than the accidents in a light rail but have the same count of injuries like in a heavy rail.
Again, people on the bus are less problematic than accidents, the incidents are the same as the light rail but the accident level is more than 70 per 100 million PMT. The demand response is the unsecured medium that the public uses as the method of transport in 2002. It has more than 250 incidents and 170 accidents, it is nearly triple than a bus, light-rail, and heavy rail and 10 times greater than commuter rail.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed means and has nearly 22 conflicts and 20 disasters, which is minimal than othe...
^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an a bus, light-rail, and heavy rail and 10 times greater than commuter rail.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78921568627 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42350779704 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480392156863 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.165947275 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13391983661 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079799579234 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456776805403 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989839686702 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020160553045 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.