The chart below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six science-related subjects at a UK university in 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the gender distribution of students doing scientific research on six subjects at a UK university in 2009.
It is evident from the chart that men almost play the majority role in every subject, except for veterinary medicine.
Male students exceedingly outnumbered female in natural science disciplines: physics, astronomy and geology. In physics, men had such a large proportion that the percentage of male students was five times as much as that of female students.
Coincide, the gender gap was narrowed in health-related subjects. The proportion of male and female students in biology was approximately the same. That was also true with medicine, where there were nearly as many women (approximately 200), as men (approximately 180). Especially, female students made up for a larger percentage than that of male students in veterinary medicine.
Overall, the bar chart shows that natural science disciplines are popular with male while women have a substantial presence in health-related subjects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55063291139 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13119758776 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6611605466 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.4444444444 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263666034481 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109985905844 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760747408233 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147002801184 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795097606042 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.