The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003-2006. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Given bar chart describes about the daily Internet usage of variously aged adult's, by per cent from 2003 to 2006.
From this chart, it can be clearly seen that, young adults used almost for times Internet than the last group, the old adults. Internet usage showed a decreasing trend as age advanced, all over the period and 2006 witnessed the maximum internet usage.
Firstly, 16 to 24 age grouped people always standed first in Internet usage with initial rate of 80 percentage which eventually peaked in 2005 to 100 percentage, before dropping to 90 at the end of the period. 25 to 44 and 45 to 54 groups showed a similer trend, eventhough the second group, was little higher in internet usage in first three years. 55 to 64 aged showed a decreased usage, incontrast the last group appeared as the least usees of Internet throughout the period with a zero percent in 2003.
On the otherhands, Internet usage was 80 percentage in 2003 by the first group which dropped to zero in last group. 2004 and 2005 showed almost a similer trend but all were decreasing as age increased and the final year showed the high rate in all age groups and gradually reduced the usage by progress in age.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Given bar chart describes about the dail...
^^^
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., all over the period and 2006 witnessed the maximum internet usage. Firstly, 16...
^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tually peaked in 2005 to 100 percentage, before dropping to 90 at the end of the ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64928909953 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36295732194 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578199052133 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.328377474 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261894702728 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133484669462 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302567621503 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182420304262 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01618067968 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.