The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006
The provided data enumerates** the cost of 800 grams of four types of bread (Wholegrain, Brown, White, Rye), calculated in Euros, in the European nation between 2001 and 2006. **As is observed,** both Brown and Whitebread increasingly became more expensive, whereas the changes in the prices of Rye and Wholegrain were marginal.
As far as the details are concerned,** Brown and Whitebread initially cost 0.6 Euro per 800g in 2001. Over 4 years, the figure gradually grew to roughly 1.6 and 1.3 in 2005 respectively, although there was a slight decrease of 0.2 Euros in the price of Brown bread in the 2003-2004 period.
It is also conspicuous that** the value of Wholegrain bread soared significantly to 1.8 as compared to where it initially started - 0.8. Despite this fact, the figure experienced a consistent reduction and finally ended up right at exactly the price it had been 4 years ago - 0.8. As for Rye bread, 800g cost 0.6 Euros in 2001 and there was a slight increase which made it cost 0.7 Euros in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , *
... between 2001 and 2006. **As is observed,** both Brown and Whitebread increasingly...
^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , *
.... As far as the details are concerned,** Brown and Whitebread initially cost 0....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82857142857 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76068346042 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634285714286 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.393096412 43.030603864 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.0 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233922627392 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124721819935 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879286759524 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154931763402 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047197605105 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.