The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given graphic representation illustrated the investigating outcomes of a survey relating to people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities for the last four weeks duration.
In general, it can be easily seen that the on-site drinks were accounted for the most choosing percentage while rarely residents purchased the organic coffee. Besides that, the instant coffee for taking away has continued to keep in stable positions.
To be more specific, analyzing the prominently initial feature, the staying demands for drinks were always remaining the top priority in all time, peak roughly 62 percent in Melbourne and Hobart. On the other hand, the percentages of instant coffee were better than fresh coffee. Precisely, in the uttermost, it got 52 in both Brisban and Hobart considering approximately 43 percent at the bottom, such a steady rate. Finally, indicating the organic coffee, it changed differently among the cities in a bad ratio, especially in Brisban, gained only about 33.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ties for the last four weeks duration. In general, it can be easily seen that t...
^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ially in Brisban, gained only about 33.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36645962733 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84763473283 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708074534161 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8922614164 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.428571429 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146984291797 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623612258271 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087500645793 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119923777532 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108788838862 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.